Skip to main content

Genki vs. Pimsleur

For some reason, people who know I study languages and that I’m particularly passionate about Japanese, always ask me what’s better: Genki: An Integrated Course in Elementary Japanese or Pimsleur. Another question I often get is, “Is Minna no Nihongo better than Genki?” I’ve never read the Minna no Nihongo books, so I can’t answer that. However, I decided to do an article on Genki vs. Pimsleur.

To be realistic, comparing these two is like comparing apples to oranges. They’re both really good, and I encourage people to use both of them, actually. I agree with Avatar’s Uncle Iroh when he explains to Zuko that wisdom comes from many places, and that if you take it from only one place, it becomes rigid and stale. Same with language learning. If you rely on only one source, you’re never going to be fluent. That’s why I review so many different sources.

So now the question becomes, “Which one should I start with?” I still maintain that everyone should start with Power Japanese, but between these two, I’d ask you, “What’s your ultimate goal?” They both teach Japanese, but the goals for each are different, and this should be apparent just by the two different styles of learning. It depends on what you want to do that will decide that.

If your goal is to go to Japan as a tourist, or perhaps briefly on business, then Pimsleur is the way to go. The goal of Pimsleur is to teach you Japanese roughly the same way you learned your native tongue. The goal of Pimsleur is to be able to speak Japanese naturally, and it excels at that. Instead of teaching you grammar, writing, and all that other stuff you didn’t learn about your own language until your school years, it will focus on getting you to take part in conversation. Even if you don’t know exactly what a word means, you’ll know how to use it.

However, because it doesn’t teach you the why behind what you’re behind taught to say, and because it doesn’t explain written Japanese, you’ll never be 100% fluent with Pimsleur. If you’re going to be in Japan temporarily, or if you’re not a language nerd like me, then Pimsleur on its own is a great starting point. If you learn by textbook alone, then actually speaking Japanese will throw you for a loop, unless you’ve learned with Pimsleur!

If your goal is fluency, then I recommend starting with Genki and using Pimsleur as a supplement. Genki teaches all that boring stuff, such as grammar, but you’ll have a better understanding of how Japanese sentence structure works, and you’ll have a better grasp on written Japanese. Not to mention, if you’re looking to pass the JLPT, Genki is definitely the way to go. It will walk you through the first 300 kanji, which is a must for that beginner’s test.

The problem with Genki is that even with the audio tapes, if you buy the expensive version, it will be harder to actually speak one-on-one with a native speaker compared to if you studied with Pimsleur. Genki will give you a larger vocabulary, knowledge of written Japanese, and extensive lessons on grammar, but it can’t train your ear to hear how Japanese is actually spoken, so if you’re just going to travel to Japan, Genki is not the way to go.

Price is also a consideration, as Pimsleur is way more expensive than Genki. As far as audio tapes go, Pimsleur is the best I’ve come across, and as far as textbooks go, Genki is probably the best in that regard as well, so it’s not like one’s quality is infinitely better than the other’s.

In the end, I can’t make the decision for you, so I encourage you to read my full review for each product, as well as my other reviews, before you make your decision. Heck, read about them beyond the confines of this blog, as others probably have different opinion. Remember, don’t take your wisdom solely from one source!

If you really want it, my person recommendation for beginners (if your goal is fluency) would go as such: Power Japanese (for the kana), Genki (for a good introduction into Japanese as a whole), and then Pimsleur (for spoken Japanese). This is what worked for me, but it may not be what works for you. How you study is up to you, and only you can decide how you learn best. And maybe your goal isn’t fluency! In that case, I really can’t help you out! In my opinion, both of these resources are great first stepping stones, although you should be aware that the goals of each method are a bit different.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review for Rosetta Stone

I told you I wasn’t gone for good! Today I’m going to be mostly bashing Rosetta Stone’s language learning software. This review goes for Rosetta Stone whether you’re learning Japanese or any other language that this software purports to teach. It purports to teach because Rosetta Stone is particularly bad at teaching anything, except how to look at pictures and repeat words. It’s aimed mostly for travelers, but doesn’t really get you conversing, and it’s expensive to boot. Really, there’s only a couple things it does well, but this isn’t enough to make up for all the failing this software does. If anyone from Rosetta Stone actually reads this, please use the criticism to improve your software! You probably already know that Rosetta Stone teaches you language easily, right? I mean, that’s what the advertisements always tell us! What Rosetta Stone tells us and what it actually does are like night and day, but if you really don’t know much about Rosetta Stone, here’s what allegedl...

Review for LingQ - Redone!

I really wanted to do a review for LingQ , and I wound up doing a long and crazy post about things that didn't have much to do with LingQ. As such, I am redoing this post in hopes of better clarifying what LingQ is and how well it works. For starters, anyone even remotely familiar with Steve Kauffman will know that he's a huge supporter of what is normally called the input method. That basically means that you learn a language simply through exposure to it. No grammar drills, just listening, reading, and anything else you can think of that will expose you to the language. As such, that is exactly what LingQ strives to do. The most frustrating thing about learning an Asian language through the input method, in my opinion, is that if you're reading a book or a non-editable pdf, if you come across a kanji you're not sure how to read, you can't just type it into a dictionary. That frustrates me a lot! That's why LingQ is so good about that. You just hover your mou...

Review for Gakuu!

When I reviewed TextFugu for a second time , I mentioned Gakuu and how TextFugu members could get 80% off. Well, I decided to give it a go and see what to make of it. What I discovered is a goldmine for sentence mining, and a great way to understand the way the Japanese talk, especially when things aren't nice and clear like they are in textbooks. My first impression was that it was TextFugu for intermediate and advanced students, and what I found was something different, and almost better. It won't overshadow TextFugu, which will continue to grow into its own advanced material, but is excellent as a suppliment for a textbook, or an amazing find if you're an input person. Output people, I'm afraid this might not be your cup of tea. Apparently the Gakuranman, as he studied Japanese through textbooks, discovered that they just weren't doing it for him the way they were when he was a beginner. Basically, they didn't seem to be teaching "real world" Japan...