Skip to main content

Remembering the Kanji 1


I'm currently doing a ton of work, and preparing an article for Nerdy Goodness regarding the new The Last Airbender film, but I decided to take a break from everything and review this rather controversial method for learning the Kanji, despite the fact that it's Friday and I should be doing a Friday Review. The method in question, Heisig's infamous Remembering the Kanji Volume 1. Why? Because, I myself have struggled with Kanji in the past. Heck, I struggle with Kanji in the present! Anyway, I was desperately looking for a method that would help me remember them (you've gotta know 2,000 of the things, you know). Although I learn best by repitition, it just wasn't cutting it. I know a lot of kanji just from regular use, but when I don't write them often enough, I just can't recall them! For me, I think I've found the answer in Heisig's method. In fact, I like it so well, that I'm going from the beginning onward rather than finding the trouble kanji and remembering them.

Kanji is one of the most difficult things for a student of Japanese to overcome. The sheer number of them is intimidating, and just looking at them will give even the most headstrong among us shaky knees. However, it is absolutely imperative to learn at least the 2,000 most commonly used kanji, and that's what Heisig tries to teach us. He uses stories and scenarios to link the kanji to a picture in our minds, which is how the human mind naturally remembers things anyway. So, why doesn't everyone like this method? Here's a few reasons, and why I think that these reasons shouldn't stop anyone from using this book.

1.) It doesn't teach you the readings.

This is probably the most common reason this book is slammed. There is a second book for the various readings, but I find that learning to just recognize the kanji is more important to a beginner, or even an advanced student, than all the different readings. We can pick up the readings very easily, but just remembering how to write each kanji and what it means is a feat in and of itself and needs to be dealt with early on - something I failed to do and am kicking myself in the pants now.

2.) It doesn't actually teach you any "real" Japanese.

By this, I mean, "You can't say the kanji out loud." It links each kanji to an English word, or meaning, and goes from there. This is probably a good thing at this point. Given that the book is intended largely for beginners, whose vocabulary is probably minimal, you want to be able to connect the kanji with an English word. It's just much, much easier. Once you overcome the hurdle of being able to recognize the kanji, obtaining vocabulary is much easier. At least, that's how my own mind seems to work.

Those are pretty much the two most commonly used arguments against the Heisig method, but I find them irrelevant. The point is, this is a great way to learn the kanji, especially for us self-taught people. Heisig himself says that this book could hinder you if you're taking classes, but since I'm not taking any, I can't exactly say whether this notion is true or not. I'll probably be taking classes in the future (I've recently decided upon a drastic career change: turning from a computer programmer into a painfully introverted teacher of the Japanese language), but by then I'll, hopefully, be able to recall the most commonly used kanji right off the top of my head!

So, do I recommend this book? Yes, I do. It's a great book for kanji (be sure to make those flashcards out!), and will be a huge asset in your studies. There's a ton of naysayers out there, but I think it's a great book. There's actually three books. The first (the one I'm reviewing) deals with the most common kanji, the second helps you recall the various readings of said kanji, and the third teaching you 1,000 more kanji. I hope to review the other two books in the future, although I personally feel it's best to learn the readings on context.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Review for LingQ - Redone!

I really wanted to do a review for LingQ , and I wound up doing a long and crazy post about things that didn't have much to do with LingQ. As such, I am redoing this post in hopes of better clarifying what LingQ is and how well it works. For starters, anyone even remotely familiar with Steve Kauffman will know that he's a huge supporter of what is normally called the input method. That basically means that you learn a language simply through exposure to it. No grammar drills, just listening, reading, and anything else you can think of that will expose you to the language. As such, that is exactly what LingQ strives to do. The most frustrating thing about learning an Asian language through the input method, in my opinion, is that if you're reading a book or a non-editable pdf, if you come across a kanji you're not sure how to read, you can't just type it into a dictionary. That frustrates me a lot! That's why LingQ is so good about that. You just hover your mou

Review for Rosetta Stone

I told you I wasn’t gone for good! Today I’m going to be mostly bashing Rosetta Stone’s language learning software. This review goes for Rosetta Stone whether you’re learning Japanese or any other language that this software purports to teach. It purports to teach because Rosetta Stone is particularly bad at teaching anything, except how to look at pictures and repeat words. It’s aimed mostly for travelers, but doesn’t really get you conversing, and it’s expensive to boot. Really, there’s only a couple things it does well, but this isn’t enough to make up for all the failing this software does. If anyone from Rosetta Stone actually reads this, please use the criticism to improve your software! You probably already know that Rosetta Stone teaches you language easily, right? I mean, that’s what the advertisements always tell us! What Rosetta Stone tells us and what it actually does are like night and day, but if you really don’t know much about Rosetta Stone, here’s what allegedl

Japanese the Manga Way

So, you think you can just go and learn basic Japanese without all those boring textbooks? You think you can just use manga? While I wouldn't recommend this book as your sole text book, I do endorse it as being a great book to familiarize yourself with casual, spoken Japanese. I'm sure another textbook comes to your mind: Japanese in Mangaland . The big difference between this book and that book is that this one uses real manga. It takes the actual manga, and then uses it to build lessons regarding reading, grammar, and other basic skills. I've heard that the manga featured in the other book is actually made up. I also found a few small errors in the Mangaland book. It slowly builds up on complex sentence structures, covering things most formal texts leave out, and it's fairly easy to remember what you've read. My biggest disappointment with this book is that it only covers basic skills. It should really come out with more volumes, like Japanese in Mangaland does,